![[ Back to EurekAlert! ]](http://www.eurekalert.org/images/back2e.gif){kind=small}
Public release date: 27-May-2013[ | E-mail |
Share ] Contact: Andrew Riley
andrew.riley@sauder.ubc.ca
604-822-8345
University of British Columbia
Unearned upgrades embarrassing for consumers
New research from UBC's Sauder School of Business reveals that giving a free bump in service can backfire for retailers if the perk is given randomly in front of others.
The new paper shows that consumers experience social discomfort when singled out for spontaneous special treatment, which may cause them to close their wallets.
"Managerial wisdom guiding service and retail industries assumes that consumers get an uptick in esteem when they're allowed to skip a queue or get an upgrade," says Assistant Professor JoAndrea Hoegg, a co-author of the forthcoming study to be published in the Journal of Consumer Research. "But our research shows that when people get unearned freebies in front of others they experience a social awkwardness that makes them less inclined to consume."
In one of a series of experiments, researchers treated participants at a product booth in two different ways. One group received free personal care products in return for "customer loyalty" and another received free products with no explanation. Some bonus transactions were witnessed, and some were private.
Results show that when the free samples were received with no explanation in front of observers, participants were less satisfied with them. The research also shows that the decline in satisfaction was driven by feelings of social discomfort, and that those who received extra samples without reason browsed for a shorter time at the booth.
"Our research suggests that if a firm is randomly selecting people to receive perks, they should make sure they receive them in private. If doing it in public, it's best that everyone knows the customer earned the upgrade to avoid unwanted embarrassment," says Hoegg.
###
The study, Consumer Reaction to Unearned Preferential Treatment, was co-authored by Assistant Professor Hoegg and Professor Darren Dahl from the Sauder School of Business, and Assistant Professor Lan Jiang from the University of Oregon.
[ | E-mail | Share ] ?
AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.
Public release date: 27-May-2013[ | E-mail |
Share ] Contact: Andrew Riley
andrew.riley@sauder.ubc.ca
604-822-8345
University of British Columbia
Unearned upgrades embarrassing for consumers
New research from UBC's Sauder School of Business reveals that giving a free bump in service can backfire for retailers if the perk is given randomly in front of others.
The new paper shows that consumers experience social discomfort when singled out for spontaneous special treatment, which may cause them to close their wallets.
"Managerial wisdom guiding service and retail industries assumes that consumers get an uptick in esteem when they're allowed to skip a queue or get an upgrade," says Assistant Professor JoAndrea Hoegg, a co-author of the forthcoming study to be published in the Journal of Consumer Research. "But our research shows that when people get unearned freebies in front of others they experience a social awkwardness that makes them less inclined to consume."
In one of a series of experiments, researchers treated participants at a product booth in two different ways. One group received free personal care products in return for "customer loyalty" and another received free products with no explanation. Some bonus transactions were witnessed, and some were private.
Results show that when the free samples were received with no explanation in front of observers, participants were less satisfied with them. The research also shows that the decline in satisfaction was driven by feelings of social discomfort, and that those who received extra samples without reason browsed for a shorter time at the booth.
"Our research suggests that if a firm is randomly selecting people to receive perks, they should make sure they receive them in private. If doing it in public, it's best that everyone knows the customer earned the upgrade to avoid unwanted embarrassment," says Hoegg.
###
The study, Consumer Reaction to Unearned Preferential Treatment, was co-authored by Assistant Professor Hoegg and Professor Darren Dahl from the Sauder School of Business, and Assistant Professor Lan Jiang from the University of Oregon.
[ | E-mail | Share ] ?
AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.
Source: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2013-05/uobc-wpd052713.php
andrew bogut monta ellis wiz khalifa taylor allderdice mixtape reggie wayne taylor allderdice vincent jackson vicki gunvalson
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.